有限采样法监测造血干细胞移植患者的白消安血药浓度

谢何琳, 吴雪梅, 庄波阳, 杨婷, 黄显, 元小红, 李晓帆, 任金华, 楼永明

中国药学杂志 ›› 2015, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (16) : 1424-1429.

PDF(1151 KB)
PDF(1151 KB)
中国药学杂志 ›› 2015, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (16) : 1424-1429. DOI: 10.11669/cpj.2015.16.014
论著

有限采样法监测造血干细胞移植患者的白消安血药浓度

  • 谢何琳1a, 吴雪梅1a, 庄波阳2, 杨婷1b, 黄显1a, 元小红1b, 李晓帆1b, 任金华1b, 楼永明2
作者信息 +

Limited Sampling Strategies for Clinical Plasma Concentration Monitoring of Busulfan in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Patients

  • XIE He-lin1a, WU Xue-mei1a, ZHUANG Bo-yang2,YANG Ting1b, HUANG Xian1a, YUAN Xiao-hong1b, LI Xiao-fan1b, REN Jin-hua1b, LOU Yong-ming2
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 建立有限采样方法(limited sampling strategy, LSS)用于估算造血干细胞移植(hematopoietic stem cell transplantation,HSCT)患者静脉滴注白消安(busulfan,Bu)后的药-时曲线面积(an area under the plasma concentration versus time curve,AUC)。方法 22例造血干细胞移植患者静脉滴注白消安后,采集若干时间点血浆样品,用LC-MS/MS测定白消安血药浓度,用经典方法计算药动学参数。另以稀疏血药浓度数据点建立多元回归数学模型,估算AUC0-6,并对模型进行验证。通过组内相关系数(intraclass correlation coefficient,ICC)和Bland-Altman (BA)分析评估经典法和有限采样方法的一致性。结果 两点(C2、C5)预测的药动学参数回归模型的线性关系较好(调整的r2=0.917),平均预测误差为0.20%,均方根误差为4.48%,组内相关系数的95%置信区间为0.914~0.984,BA分析一致性界限为-0.9~8.8。与经典法评价结果一致。结论 C2、C5估算AUC0-6的有限采样法可用于白消安的临床血药浓度监测。

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To establish limited sampling strategy to estimate area under the curve (AUC) of HSCT patients who had received busulfan (Bu) intravenous infusion. METHODS Plasma samples were collected at certain time points from 22 HSCT patients who had received busulfan intravenous infusion. The LC-MS/MS method was used to measure blood concentration of busulfan. The classical method was used to calculate pharmacokinetic parameters. To estimate AUC0-6, measured blood concentration data was used to build a multiple linear regression model which was subsequently validated. Consistency between results produced by the traditional method and the proposed LSS respectively was assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman (BA) analysis. RESULTS It is shown that model based on concentrations on two sampling time points (2 and 5 h) is able to predict AUC0-6accurately (adjusted r2=0.917. MPE=0.2%, RMSE=4.48%). The 95% confidence interval of ICC is 0.914-0.984 while the limit of agreement in the BA is -0.9-8.8. Results produced by limited sampling strategy are nearly consistent with AUC0-6 produced by the classical method. CONCLUSION The proposed limited sampling strategy to estimate AUC0-6 based on C2 and C5 can be used to busulfan blood concentration monitoring in clinical practice.

关键词

白消安 / 经典法 / 有限采样法 / 血药浓度监测

Key words

classic method / limited sampling strategy / blood concentration monitoring

引用本文

导出引用
谢何琳, 吴雪梅, 庄波阳, 杨婷, 黄显, 元小红, 李晓帆, 任金华, 楼永明. 有限采样法监测造血干细胞移植患者的白消安血药浓度[J]. 中国药学杂志, 2015, 50(16): 1424-1429 https://doi.org/10.11669/cpj.2015.16.014
XIE He-lin, WU Xue-mei, ZHUANG Bo-yang,YANG Ting, HUANG Xian, YUAN Xiao-hong, LI Xiao-fan, REN Jin-hua, LOU Yong-ming. Limited Sampling Strategies for Clinical Plasma Concentration Monitoring of Busulfan in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Patients[J]. Chinese Pharmaceutical Journal, 2015, 50(16): 1424-1429 https://doi.org/10.11669/cpj.2015.16.014
中图分类号: R969.1   

参考文献

[1] ZHENG P,LIU S T,LI C F,et al. Pharmacokinetics of bufulfan in pediatric and adult patients prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.Chin Pharm J(中国药学杂志),2013,48(13):1088-1093.
[2] HASSAN B M,LJUNGMAN P,BOLME P,et al.Busulfan bioavailability.Blood,1994,84(7):2144-2150.
[3] MCCUNE J S,GIBBS J P,SLANERY J T.Plasma concentration monitoring of busulfan:Does it improve clinical outcome .Clin Pharmacokinet,2000,39(2):155-164.
[4] HOFFER E,AKRIA L,ACHERB I,et al.A simple approximationfor busulfan dose adjustment in adult patient undergoing bonemarrow transplantation.Ther Drug Monit,2004,26 (3):33l-335.
[5] ANDERSSON B S,KASHYAP A,GIAN V,et al. Conditioningtherapy withintravenous busu1fan and cyclophosphamide(IVBuCy2)for hematologic malignancies prior to allogeneic stemce1l transplantation:A phase II study.Biol Blood Marrow Transplant,2002,8(3):l45-154.
[6] ANDERSSON B S,MADDEN T,TRAN H T,et al. Acute safety andpharmacokinetics of intravenous busulfan when used with oral busulfan and cyclophosphamide as pre-transplantation conditioning therapy:A phase I study. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant,2000,6(5):548-554.
[7] DUPUIS L L, CATBRYN S, TAL S, et al. IV Busulfan dose individualization in children under going hematopoietic stem cell transplant:Limited sampling strategies. Bio Blood Marrow Transplant, 2008, 14(5):576-582.
[8] XU G.Jackknife estimation and its application .J Shandong Normal Univ(山东师范大学学报),2000,15:454-455.
[9] EFRON B. Bootstrap methods:Another look at the Jackknife. Annals Stat,1979,7(1):1-12.
[10] BAO H C. A new way to reduce the standard deviation of the random errors-“Jackknife”.J Staff Worker′s Univ(职大学报),2004,2:18-21.
[11] XU L,LV Y H,YANG J,et al. Prediction of the AUC and the comparison of approaches for validation.Chin J Clin Pharmacol Ther(中国临床药理学与治疗学),2007,12(9):1062-1067.
[12] ZHOU Y H, XU J F, HE J, et al. Evaluation and application on different assessment methods of consistency of diagnostic test. Chin J Health Statist(中国卫生统计学),2011,28(1):41-42.

基金

福建省战略新兴技术应用资助项目(2013J01371);福建省教育厅科研资助项目(JB11058)
PDF(1151 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/